"It is worth repeating: the individuals who originally brought this suit and now are against the settlement rode into court with the intention of helping their struggling brethren that had previously played within the N.F.L . Yet Mut 23 coins, they are today broke and, often, having to deal with injuries or illnesses directly related their playing days. It's the height of absurdity for these plaintiffs to claim as if they were children who are not allowed dessert that the settlement "does not give enough benefit to the players who filed the suit."
If players opt out of the settlement are able to file personal lawsuits against the league. They could be more encouraged to do this in light of recent developments in the O'Bannon vs. NCAA case, too and now that former college players are filing lawsuits over the use of their images to play video games.
In July In July, The Ninth Circuit threw out an appeal brought by video game producer EA Sports. The decision dismissed the argument of EA that likenesses of players were protected under the First Amendment and it will allow the case to continue.
The Dryer plaintiffs are observing that case carefully. They're also monitoring another lawsuit that was filed by thousands of ex- Madden NFL 23 participants over concussions.
"I think there's some kind of correlation between the two at this point," Dryer said of the two cases madden 23 coins buy. "The Madden NFL 23 is looking very capriciously and cavalierly at the concussion issues.